Parents would be looking at their emails while the children would be making excited bids for their attention.
and if those faces are blank and unresponsive—as they often are when absorbed in a device—it can be extremely disconcerting foe the children.
Radesky cites the "still face experiment" devised by developmental psychologist Ed Tronick in the 1970s.
In it, a mother is asked to interact with her child in a normal way
before putting on a blank expression and not giving them any visual social feedback;
The child becomes increasingly distressed as she tries to capture her mother's attention.
"Parents don't have to be exquisitely parents at all times, but there needs to be a balance
and parents need to be responsive and sensitive to a child's verbal or nonverbal expressions of an emotional need," says Radesky.
On the other hand, Tronick himself is concerned that the worries about kids' use of screens
are born out of an "oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting" with their children:
"It's based on a somewhat fantasized, very white, very upper-middle-class ideology
that says if you're failing to expose your child to 30,000 words you are neglecting them."
Tronick believes that just because a child isn't learning from the screen doesn't mean there's no value to it,
particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break from their child.
Parents, he says, can get a lot out of using their devices to speak to a friend or get some work out of the way.
This can make them feel happier, which lets then be more available to their child the rest of the time.